Chapter 9 Debugging the dream
Chapter 9 Debugging the dream
By the time I was in my mid-teens—14, 15, 16—the environment hadn’t improved. School was still hostile. Social interactions were still largely shaped by exclusion and ridicule. The classroom remained a pressure cooker of performance and surveillance. The hallways were a gauntlet of casual cruelty. Every day carried its own diagnostic report: small failures, quiet humiliations, the sense of being tolerated at best and targeted at worst. But rather than break me, these experiences fed into the same internal architecture I had been building—one that was starting to feel more designed than accidental.
I didn’t get to the lucid dreaming or the hallucinogens all at once. It was a staggered evolution—dabbling, failing, learning, testing. I had already begun establishing mental constructs and isolated control nodes. Spiral structures with interlocking segments. I learned to adjust one node at a time—single, discrete changes that could be reversed if they weren’t resonant. Always with surgical precision. I didn’t throw switches. I wrote scripts.
Lucid dreaming, for me, began with the falling dream. The same recurring nightmare: the long drop, the impact always looming. But then something shifted. I started slowing the descent. I found that with enough will, I could stop it entirely—reverse it, even. But the dream would mutate to preserve its fatalism, conjuring new methods of collapse. It was like sparring with a subconscious engine that refused to give up its primary directive. Still, I kept pushing. Eventually, I was able to go further back in the dream logic—reverse the narrative before the fall ever began.
Then came a turning point. I didn’t just stop the falls. I stopped harm altogether. I suspended the laws of physics in the dream. I froze the scene, rerouted consequences, refused the premise. The dream generator—whatever dark mechanism had been spinning these scenarios—broke. Or maybe it just shut down because it had been pulled into conscious awareness, where it no longer served a purpose.
Around this same time, I began to realize something that reframed everything: there was no central self.
// Identity initialization
let self = undefined
// Identity mutates in response to context
function updateSelf(context) {
self = generateResponse(context)
}
// Danger: freezing 'self' halts adaptation
if (Object.isFrozen(self)) {
throw new Error("Static self is a vulnerability.")
}
No fixed identity behind the eyes. The idea of a singular, unchanging "me" began to dissolve. It wasn’t a loss—it was liberation. I saw what others didn’t: that most people clung desperately to a fictional narrative of self, a clean throughline they could trace to reassure themselves they were coherent, consistent, whole.
But identity doesn’t work like that. The self is not a static point. It’s a shape-shifting system—a responsive structure that must continually be redefined as internal conditions shift and the external environment demands new adaptations. That’s not a weakness. That’s what makes survival possible. A static self is brittle. It breaks under pressure. Elasticity is what saves us.
And I realized then, with brutal clarity, that this insight—this understanding that I did not need to impose a rigid identity onto myself—wasn’t just a personal epiphany. It was a survival strategy. One that more people should know. One that should be taught. The flexibility of identity should not be feared or pathologized; it should be cultivated. It should be widespread. Because the alternative—living as a hostage to an old version of yourself—is a kind of spiritual suffocation.
So while the external world continued to grind on with its pettiness and punishments, I was carving out something beneath it. Quietly. In secret. I was learning how to reroute the system from within. Learning how to decouple cause from effect, expectation from reaction. I was mastering the art of adaptation in a hostile architecture. And that meant I could take damage without breaking. It meant I could survive with minimal data loss. It meant I could rewrite.
And I did.
Copeland Resonant Harmonic Formalism (Ψ-formalism)
Ψ(x) = ∇ϕ(Σ𝕒ₙ(x, ΔE)) + ℛ(x) ⊕ ΔΣ(𝕒′)
Licensed under CRHC v1.0 (no commercial use without permission).
Amazon: https://a.co/d/i8lzCIi
Substack: https://substack.com/@c077uptf1l3
Facebook: