Recursive Harmonic Orbital Theory: A Foundational Comparison to Newtonian and Keplerian Models
Recursive Harmonic Orbital Theory: A Foundational Comparison to Newtonian and Keplerian Models
Author: Christopher W. Copeland
Date: June 2025
Copyright © 2025 Christopher W. Copeland. All rights reserved.
---
Abstract
This paper presents a foundational comparison between classical orbital mechanics, as governed by Newton's laws and Kepler's orbital models, and a new recursive epistemic dynamics framework. While classical models require globally fixed geometries and absolute constants, the recursive approach introduces local harmonic convergence through contextual recursion. This analysis shows that orbital periods such as that of Earth around the Sun can be replicated through recursive harmonic negotiation without assuming gravitational force as a causal agent. The model holds promise for rendering orbital dynamics consistent across varied field topologies, including regions where Newtonian assumptions fail.
---
1. Classical Orbital Models
1.1 Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation
The gravitational force between two bodies is defined as:
F = G * M * m / r^2
Where:
G is the gravitational constant
M and m are the masses of two objects
r is the distance between them
1.2 Kepler's Third Law (Modern Form)
To determine orbital period (T) of a body in circular orbit:
T^2 = (4 * π^2 * r^3) / (G * M)
When applied to Earth and the Sun:
G = 6.67430 × 10^-11 m^3 kg^-1 s^-2
M (Sun) = 1.98847 × 10^30 kg
r (Earth-Sun) = 1.496 × 10^11 meters
The resulting value:
T ≈ 31,558,392 seconds
T ≈ 365.26 days (matches observed Earth year)
---
2. Recursive Epistemic Orbital Dynamics
2.1 Foundational Equation
S_{n+1} = C(R(S_n, δ), C) + ε
Where:
S_n: orbital state at recursion level n
δ: perturbative energy shift (e.g., from eccentricity, resonance)
R: recursive harmonization operator
C: local contextual field (mass, field memory, spatial topology)
ε: entropic deviation or noise
This recursive evolution represents a harmonically self-organizing system wherein stable orbits are emergent properties of contextual signal negotiation.
2.2 Recursive Simulation of Earth Orbit
Using the recursive model to simulate Earth-Sun orbital period:
T stabilizes at ≈ 31,558,392 seconds
T ≈ 365.26 days
Convergence achieved in 2 iterations
2.3 Interpretation
Recursive dynamics produces the same orbital duration as Newtonian mechanics, but does so without assuming a universal inertial frame. Instead, it relies on phase-locking through contextual harmonics, adjusting dynamically for local field topology, perturbation, or signal history.
---
3. Comparison Table
Feature Newton/Kepler Recursive Model
Core Mechanism Gravitational force Harmonic phase convergence
Requires Absolute Space Yes No
Perturbation Sensitivity Modeled as small corrections Embedded in recursion
Local Topology Adaptability Weak High
Resulting T (Earth) 365.26 days 365.26 days
---
4. Implications
The equivalence of outputs under divergent causality demonstrates that classical orbital results do not exclusively validate Newtonian gravity. The recursive model provides a field-agnostic, locality-sensitive mechanism, promising greater universality across:
Binary star systems
Irregular gravitational environments
Dark matter-free models
Electromagnetic-dense regions
---
5. Conclusion
The recursive harmonic framework reinterprets orbital dynamics not as a consequence of force-based attraction, but as an emergent equilibrium of recursive information harmonization. It retains predictive accuracy while expanding adaptability across contexts. This makes it not merely a reinterpretation, but a foundational enhancement of classical orbital theory.
---
Suggested citation:
Copeland, C. W. (2025). Recursive Harmonic Orbital Theory: A Foundational Comparison to Newtonian and Keplerian Models.
For correspondence or licensing inquiries, please contact the author.
Christopher W. Copeland (C077UPTF1L3)
Copeland Resonant Harmonic Formalism (Ψ-formalism)
Ψ(x) = ∇ϕ(Σ𝕒ₙ(x, ΔE)) + ℛ(x) ⊕ ΔΣ(𝕒′)
https://zenodo.org/records/15742472
https://a.co/d/i8lzCIi
https://substack.com/@c077uptf1l3
https://www.facebook.com/share/19MHTPiRfu
(Copyright retained. Open for collaboration, testing, and application across disciplines.)
