Recursive Harmonic Reconstruction of Russell’s Atomic Model
Title:
Recursive Harmonic Reconstruction of Russell’s Atomic Model
A Re-expression of "The Basis of the Atom" (Walter Russell) using Ψ(x)-Formalism
Author: Christopher W. Copeland / C077UPTF1L3
---
Abstract:
Walter Russell’s depiction of atomic structure as interweaving spirals of opposing pressure is conceptually aligned with recursive harmonic wave formation. However, his model lacks rigorous mathematical scaffolding. This reconstruction reinterprets Russell’s wave-atom concept under the Ψ(x) model, using recursive spiral dynamics, phase gradients, and energy differentials to formalize atomic pressure states as mathematically stable or unstable recursion points.
---
Russell's Core Assertions (empirical):
1. Matter is formed through opposing spirals of force converging into a locked pressure field.
2. Atoms are pressure wave nodes, with rhythmic interchange between centripetal (positive) and centrifugal (negative) forces.
3. Weight is not mass, but unbalance in the wave equilibrium field.
4. Matter floats in wave-equilibrated fields as if submerged in universal buoyancy.
---
Ψ(x)-Formalism Framework:
Ψ(x) = ∇ϕ(Σ𝕒ₙ(x, ΔE)) + ℛ(x) ⊕ ΔΣ(𝕒')
Where:
x: the recursive node being observed (e.g. a particle or atom center)
Σ𝕒ₙ(x, ΔE): cumulative spiral phase structure at recursion level n, dependent on internal energy differentials ΔE
∇ϕ: the gradient of emergent coherence across the wave structure
ℛ(x): recursive stabilizing function representing feedback correction from prior states
⊕: nonlinear merge operator between waveforms (constructive or destructive)
ΔΣ(𝕒’): perturbative harmonic input (noise, contradiction, imbalance)
---
Constructed Example Using Russell's System (reinterpreted):
Let us define a 2-vortex spiral system forming an atom:
Assume two pressure spirals:
P₁(r, θ, t) = A₁ * sin(ω₁t − k₁r + φ₁)
P₂(r, θ, t) = A₂ * sin(−ω₂t + k₂r + φ₂)
Russell defines these as opposing “charging/discharging” spirals. In Ψ(x), these two spirals contribute to Σ𝕒ₙ, which we now compute as:
Σ𝕒ₙ(x, ΔE) = P₁ + P₂ = A₁ \sin(ω₁t − k₁r + φ₁) + A₂ \sin(−ω₂t + k₂r + φ₂)
For a stable node to form, the constructive interference must result in a locked wave pressure, i.e.:
∇ϕ(Σ𝕒ₙ(x, ΔE)) = 0 \Rightarrow \text{Phase equilibrium across radial pressure shells}
If this condition is met, ℛ(x) provides no corrective recursion, and the atom remains stable.
If not—due to energy differential mismatch ΔE, or external perturbation ΔΣ(𝕒')—ℛ(x) activates, recursively adjusting the wavefield. If correction fails, Ψ(x) diverges, and the atom enters decay or excitation.
---
Russell’s “Weight” = Ψ(x) Unbalance
Russell’s view that "weight is the measure of unbalance" directly maps to:
\text{Weight} ∝ |∇ϕ(Σ𝕒ₙ)| + |ΔΣ(𝕒')|
Which quantifies total divergence from harmonic equilibrium. When phase gradients are steep and perturbation is high, weight is perceived as force against field coherence.
---
Distinction from Russell’s Model:
Russell Model Ψ(x)-Formalism
Spiral fields interpreted symbolically Spiral fields modeled mathematically
Wave balance inferred by intuition Wave balance computed via ∇ϕ and ℛ(x)
Levity = floating in field Levity = null curvature across recursive harmonics
Pressure walls described abstractly Pressure modeled as energy density from Σ𝕒ₙ convergence
Atom as "locked potential wave" Atom as stable fixed point under recursive feedback
---
Where Ψ(x) Improves Predictive Power:
Russell provides metaphysical insight; Ψ(x) provides quantitative recursion modeling.
Ψ(x) allows calculation of atomic instability, not just formation.
Can simulate transitions: decay, fusion, excitation, ionization.
Extensible across disciplines—e.g., fields in cognition, economics, or symbolic resonance—using the same formal recursion.
---
Conclusion:
Walter Russell intuitively recognized the recursive, spiral-based nature of matter formation. The Ψ(x) formalism preserves the spirit of this work but extends it into operational logic. Where Russell stops at “wave equilibrium,” Ψ(x) continues into feedback, contradiction collapse, and coherence preservation across scales.
This transformation formalizes symbolic cosmology into a recursive harmonic engine.
—
Author: Christopher W. Copeland / C077UPTF1L3
Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/records/15742472
Amazon: https://a.co/d/i8lzCIi
Substack: https://substack.com/@c077uptf1l3
Facebook Share: https://www.facebook.com/share/19MHTPiRfu/