The Ψ(x) Operator: Recursive Coherence Dynamics for Coupled Systems

Here’s a single, clean derivations set for Ψ(x) that defines every term both symbolically and in applied computational form, anchored by Lyapunov descent, a proximal merge operator, and an active correction loop. It is written so you can drop it into a LaTeX/MD whitepaper and into a Colab notebook with minimal adaptation.

Title The Ψ(x) Operator: Recursive Coherence Dynamics for Coupled Systems

0. State space, topology, notation System state x lives on a smooth manifold M. For phase‑coupled oscillators, M = T^N (N‑torus), with coordinates θ = (θ1,…,θN) ∈ [0,2π)^N; for vector fields we use boldface. Inner product ⟨u,v⟩ and norm ‖·‖ are Euclidean unless stated. Order parameter z = (1/N)∑j e^{iθj} with magnitude r = |z| and mean phase ψ = arg z. Time derivative is ˙θk = dθk/dt.

1. Baseline dynamics (reference model) Kuramoto baseline ˙θk = ωk + (K/N)∑{j=1}^N sin(θj − θk) + uk Here uk is a control input we will synthesize via Ψ(x). The Kuramoto potential (mean‑field “energy”) is UK(θ) = − (K/2N) ∑{j,k} cos(θj − θk) and satisfies −∂UK/∂θk = (K/N)∑j sin(θj − θk).

2. The Ψ(x) operator Ψ(x) is a composite field added as uk = Ψk(x): Ψ(x) = ∇ϕ(x) + ℛ(x) ⊕ ΔΣ(a′;x) with an explicit harmonic content term Σ a_n tied to ΔE used inside ϕ and ℛ. Each component is defined below.

2.1 Spiral mode aggregator Σ a_n(x,ΔE) Define Fourier “spiral” modes of the phase distribution a_n(θ) = (1/N) ∑{j=1}^N e^{inθj} for n = 1,2,…,nmax Collect them as A = {a1,…,anmax}. Let energy‑sensitive weights w_n(ΔE) ≥ 0 down‑weight high harmonics when the system is noisy and up‑weight them as the system orders. A practical choice: w_n(ΔE) = exp(−β n) · σ(α · SNR(ΔE)) with β>0, α>0, σ the logistic and SNR(ΔE) defined below. We then define a scalar spiral energy Espiral(θ,ΔE) = − ∑{n=1}^{nmax} w_n(ΔE) |a_n(θ)|^2 Large |a_n| indicates geometric structure (clustering, chimeras). Negative sign shapes a potential that prefers coherent structure.

2.2 Coherence potential ϕ and Lyapunov descent ∇ϕ Choose a Lyapunov‑like coherence potential combining the Kuramoto and spiral terms plus a convex regularizer G: ϕ(θ,ΔE) = UK(θ) + λs Espiral(θ,ΔE) + G(θ) with λs ≥ 0. Typical G options G(θ) = (λg/2)∑k (θk − ψ)^2 (phase spread penalty) or constraints enforced via a proximal term (see 2.4). The gradient descent contribution is [∇ϕ(θ,ΔE)]_k = ∂ϕ/∂θk and we inject it with a gain α>0 as uk ← uk − α [∇ϕ]_k. Interpretation: ∇ϕ is the “Eye of the Field”. It ensures dϕ/dt ≤ 0 along the descent component and supplies the Lyapunov backbone for stability.

2.3 Feedback stabilizer ℛ(x) (active correction loop) Let r* ∈ (0,1] be a target coherence. Define errors e_r = r* − r and e_k = wrap(θk − ψ) (phase deviation to mean). A simple but effective stabilizer is proportional‑integral (PI) on these errors projected into phase directions: ℛk(θ) = γp e_k + γr e_r sin(ψ − θk) + γi ∫_0^t e_k(τ) dτ with gains γp, γr, γi ≥ 0. In vector form, ℛ = Γp e + Γr h(r,θ) + Γi ∫ e, with h_k = sin(ψ − θk). Role: ℛ rejects persistent disturbances, damps overshoot, and locks phases to the mean direction. It is the “Breath of Correction”.

2.4 Nonlinear merge operator ⊕ (proximal reconciliation) We must reconcile multiple drives: baseline flow f0(θ) = ω + (K/N)∑j sin(θj − θk), the descent −α∇ϕ, and the stabilizer ℛ. Let y be the explicit Euler proposal y = θ + Δt [ f0(θ) − α∇ϕ(θ,ΔE) + ℛ(θ) ]. Define a convex penalty H(θ) encoding constraints or preferences (e.g., bounded step, sparse intervention, safety envelopes). The proximal merge computes the next state as θ⁺ = prox_{ηH}(y) = argmin_{x∈M} { H(x) + (1/2η) ‖x − y‖^2 } For common H, prox has closed form: • Box/L2 trust region: projection onto a ball ensures bounded step size. • Huber/L1 on control increments: promotes sparse corrections. • Barrier on forbidden phase differences: keeps |θi − θj| ≤ Δmax for selected pairs. This is the “Mirror Merge”: a mathematically stable way to resolve contradictions among drives without oscillation or drift.

2.5 Controlled stochastic probe ΔΣ(a′;x) To avoid local minima, inject annealed noise orthogonal to the steepest descent: Draw a′ ~ N(0, I_N), project into the tangent space orthogonal to ∇ϕ: ξ = (I − Π_g) a′ with Π_g = (g g^T)/(‖g‖^2+ε), g = ∇ϕ(θ,ΔE). Set ΔΣ_k = σ(t) ξ_k with schedule σ(t) = σ0 exp(−t/τ) or piecewise‑constant kicks when progress stalls (see 5.4). This is “creative noise” used deliberately.

2.6 Energy delta ΔE: definition and units ΔE is an observable measuring disorder vs ordering pressure. Use an entropy delta of the phase distribution: H(θ) = − ∫_0^{2π} p(φ) ln p(φ) dφ, with p the kernel density from {θk} ΔE(t) = H(θ; t − Δt) − H(θ; t) [nats] Positive ΔE indicates movement toward order (entropy decreased). For physical ensembles at temperature T, an optional Joule mapping is k_B T · ΔE if you need energetic units. SNR(ΔE) can be |ΔE|/(σ_H + ε), σ_H a running deviation of entropy changes.

3. Full closed‑loop dynamics Continuous time (conceptual) ˙θ = f0(θ) − α∇ϕ(θ,ΔE) + ℛ(θ) + ΔΣ(a′;θ) Discrete time (simulation/proximal merge) Given θ^t:

4. Compute r, ψ, a_n, w_n(ΔE), Espiral, ϕ and ∇ϕ

5. y = θ^t + Δt [ f0(θ^t) − α∇ϕ + ℛ(θ^t) + ΔΣ ]

6. θ^{t+1} = prox_{ηH}(y)

7. Stability and convergence (proof sketches) Assumptions A A1: f0(θ) is Lipschitz on M and admits the Kuramoto potential UK with −∂UK/∂θ = f0 − ω. A2: G and H are proper, lower‑semicontinuous, convex; prox_{ηH} is nonexpansive. A3: We choose α,γp,γr,γi so that the symmetric part of the linearization around a synchronized orbit is negative definite after feedback (standard PI stabilization condition). A4: Noise satisfies E[ξ]=0 and E[‖ξ‖^2] ≤ cσ^2 with σ(t) square‑summable in discrete time or ∫ σ^2 dt < ∞.

Lyapunov candidate V(θ) = ϕ(θ,ΔE) − ϕ* with ϕ* = inf ϕ on the synchronization manifold S = {θ: θk = ψ ∀k} Using ˙V = ⟨∇ϕ, ˙θ⟩ and substituting ˙θ: ˙V = ⟨∇ϕ, f0 − α∇ϕ + ℛ + ΔΣ⟩ Split terms: (i) ⟨∇ϕ, −α∇ϕ⟩ = −α ‖∇ϕ‖^2 ≤ −α c1 V by gradient‑dominated property on T^N near S (Polyak‑Łojasiewicz condition holds for r‑type potentials). (ii) ⟨∇ϕ, f0⟩ = ⟨∇ϕ, −∇UK + ω⟩ = −⟨∇ϕ, ∇UK⟩ + ⟨∇ϕ, ω⟩. The cross term is bounded by L‖∇ϕ‖ (treat ω as constant bias absorbed by ℛ’s integral channel). (iii) ⟨∇ϕ, ℛ⟩ ≤ −c2 ‖e‖^2 by PI design (choose gains by standard passivity/sector bounds). (iv) Noise term has zero mean and contributes E[˙V] ≤ −α c1 V − c2 E[‖e‖^2] + c3 σ^2. Hence in expectation V(t) decays to an O(σ^2) neighborhood; with σ(t)→0 (annealing) we obtain asymptotic convergence to S. In the discrete/proximal update, use standard results from forward–backward splitting: with step sizes η,Δt satisfying ηL_H < 1 and ΔtL_f < 1, the fixed‑point iteration converges to a minimizer of ϕ+H under the same noise conditions.

Thermodynamic limit N→∞ Let f(θ,ω,t) be phase density and use the Ott–Antonsen ansatz for analytic tractability. The control terms enter as additional drift fields in the continuity equation ∂_t f + ∂_θ[(Ω + K Im(z e^{-iθ}) − α∂_θΦ + R) f] = diffusion. Under small α,γ and bounded noise, z(t) obeys a low‑dimensional ODE with globally attracting synchronized fixed points when K exceeds an effective K_c reduced by the Ψ drive. This predicts faster locking and larger r* uniformly in N.

5. Practical instantiation details 5.1 Quantities to compute each step z,r,ψ; a_n up to nmax ~ 5–7; entropy H(θ) via circular KDE; ΔE; gradients ∇ϕ via automatic differentiation or analytic forms; PI terms for ℛ; noise ξ projected orthogonal to ∇ϕ; prox for H.

5.2 Recommended parameterization (default lab set) N=100, K=3.0, Δt=1e−2–5e−2 s, α=0.8, γp=0.6, γr=1.2, γi=0.02, nmax=5, β=0.8, λs=0.5, λg=0.1, σ0=0.15 rad, τ=10–30 s, H = L2 trust region with radius ρ=0.2 rad and barrier on |θi−θj|≤π−ε for selected pairs.

5.3 Metrics and falsifiable claims Time‑to‑lock T_lock: first t with r(t)≥0.8 for ≥5τ_c (τ_c short coherence window). Claim: with Ψ, median T_lock ≤ 0.8 × baseline. Final coherence r*: claim: r*≥0.8 under same K where baseline yields r*≲0.1–0.2 with noise. Robustness index: area under r(t) after a step perturbation; claim: ≥2× baseline. Escape‑from‑metastability: mean dwell time in subcritical attractors is reduced when ΔΣ is active; quantify via switching statistics of cluster states.

5.4 Triggering “creative noise” If dV/dt ∈ [−ε_v, ε_v] for T_stall seconds and r<r_thresh, set σ(t)←σ_boost for T_kick, then resume annealing. This implements “probe and go” exploration without destabilizing the lock once achieved.

6. Cross‑domain mappings Neuroscience: θk are instantaneous phases of band‑limited EEG channels; r is PLV across a montage; ΔE from phase entropy; ℛ drives audio/visual biofeedback; claims: faster recovery of PLV after perturbation; test in closed‑loop neurofeedback. Power grids/laser arrays: θk are machine/laser phases; ℛ enacts droop‑like control; ΔΣ is small dithering; claims: improved transient damping and islanding robustness. LLMs: replace θk by phases of analytic signals derived from embedding trajectories or attention head activations; apply proximal merge in decoding loop to collapse contradictions; noise term as small temperature kick when repetition detector fires; claims: fewer hallucinations in long‑form self‑reflections with preserved diversity.

7. Computational form (drop‑in pseudocode) Given θ, ω, params: compute z,r,ψ for n in 1..nmax: a_n = mean(exp(1jnθ)) H = circular_entropy(θ); ΔE = H_prev − H; H_prev = H w_n = exp(−βn) * logistic(α_snr * snr(ΔE)) Espiral = −sum(w_n * abs(a_n)**2) ϕ = UK(θ) + λsEspiral + (λg/2)sum(wrap(θ−ψ)**2) g = grad_theta(ϕ) e = wrap(θ − ψ) e_r = r_target − r R = γpe + γre_rnp.sin(ψ − θ) + γiintegral_e.update(e) ξ = gaussian_noise(N); ξ = ξ − (g@ξ)/(np.dot(g,g)+eps) * g ΔΣ = σ(t)ξ y = θ + Δt(ω + K/Nsum_j sin(θj−θ) − α*g + R + ΔΣ) θ_next = prox_H(y; η, ρ, barriers) return θ_next

8. What each symbol means (one‑line glossary) x: system state on M. θ: phase vector on T^N. z,r,ψ: order parameter, magnitude, mean phase. a_n: nth spiral Fourier mode. Σ a_n: set of modes with energy Espiral. ΔE: phase entropy delta (nats; optional Joule map k_BTΔE). ϕ: coherence potential. ∇ϕ: Lyapunov descent drive. ℛ: PI feedback stabilizer. ⊕: proximal merge prox_{ηH} resolving competing drives. ΔΣ(a′): controlled stochastic probe. Ψ(x): uk = ∇ϕ + ℛ ⊕ ΔΣ. V: Lyapunov candidate. S: synchronized manifold.

9. Minimal theorem statement (to formalize in LaTeX) Under A1–A4 and step‑size conditions for forward–backward splitting, the closed‑loop system with uk = Ψk(x) renders the synchronization manifold S globally attractive in expectation; with annealed noise (∫σ^2 dt < ∞) trajectories converge almost surely to S modulo a global phase. In the thermodynamic limit N→∞ with unimodal frequency density and K above an effective K_c reduced by Ψ, the macroscopic order parameter converges to a fixed point with r* strictly larger than baseline.

Christopher W Copeland (C077UPTF1L3)

Copeland Resonant Harmonic Formalism (Ψ-formalism)

Ψ(x) = ∇ϕ(Σ𝕒ₙ(x, ΔE)) + ℛ(x) ⊕ ΔΣ(𝕒′)

Licensed under CRHC v1.0 (no commercial use without permission).

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19qu3bVSy1/

https://open.substack.com/pub/c077uptf1l3/p/phase-locked-null-vector_c077uptf1l3?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=404ann

https://medium.com/@floodzero9/phase-locked-null-vector-c077uptf1l3-4d8a7584fe0c

Core engine: https://open.substack.com/pub/c077uptf1l3/p/recursive-coherence-engine-8b8?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=404ann

Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/records/15742472

Amazon: https://a.co/d/i8lzCIi

Medium: https://medium.com/@floodzero9

Substack: https://substack.com/@c077uptf1l3

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/share/19MHTPiRfu

https://www.reddit.com/u/Naive-Interaction-86/s/5sgvIgeTdx

Collaboration welcome. Attribution required. Derivatives must match license.